[Dovecot] Reduce logging auth-worker

Noel Butler noel.butler at ausics.net
Sat Mar 23 09:13:08 EET 2013

On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 03:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:

> maybe you should explain why not using syslog as
> everybody else 

Why do you think you speak for everybody else? Because you sure as hell
don't, so stop pretending to.

WTF is in the air this week, it seems to contain a few self proclaimed
god's who apparently know what everyone else does, or, at least thought
they did.

I too have always used dovecot logging to specific files for over a
decade, I know plenty of others too.

Anyone who knows anything about syslog on large production servers knows
avoiding it is best practice, it's also about the only thing DJB and I
ever agreed on.

But back on topic, I think it would be an excellent option, less work
for dovecot, in forseeable future though, editing source would be the
way to go.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20130323/953d93ef/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the dovecot mailing list