On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 12:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:

On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 19:40, Jeremy Katz wrote:

...

It would be nice for the sake of not conflicting to have the PAM service name not be imap. Especially as the same service name is used for pop as well :)

I could change it to use imap for imap and pop3 for pop3.

...

My recommendation would be to use dovecot instead. Any other opinions?

Well, I'm not really against that either.

The primary advantage of this being that then there are no worries about pesky file conflicts between dovecot and uw-imap. Plus it makes it more obvious exactly which imap the pam config is for.

Cheers,

Jeremy

PS dovecot lands in rawhide tomorrow