[Dovecot] fd leak in 1.0rc7?
Hi,
I just upgraded a 0.99 installation to 1.0rc7 (going from mbox to maildir along the way, but that's another story), and I'm seeing a rather fast fd quick; I already had to restart dovecot once, after a few hours.
What is leaked are pipes, left open on the master dovecot process while the other end is long gone. I can't tell right now if it happens for every single login process spawned (either pop3 or imap), but at least a lot of them.
FWIW, I'm running dovecot 1.0rc7 on NetBSD 2.0.3_STABLE. I'll try debugging tomorrow, but if anyone has an idea what happens in the meantime, I'm all hears.
-- Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org "When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea." KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:23:55AM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
... and LDAP authentication over a ldapi socket, in case it matters.
-- Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org "When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea." KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 01:23 +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
Have you figured out anything yet?
Pipes are created for logging. I haven't been able to reproduce this fd leak myself, but since several people have ran into "too many open files" problems I guess it could be because of fd leaks..
I don't really see how it could leak though. Or maybe there are problems with noticing that the other end of the pipe died with non-Linux OSes? For example are you using kqueue? I haven't tested it with that.
Also do you see any "Sending log messages too fast, throttling.." messages in your logs? That part of the code is a bit weird, so it might have caused them.
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:40:10AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes, I have identified the culprit as the kqueue code.
Nope, no such thing in the logs.
I haven't gone much further with the investigation; not using kqueue made the problem go away, so I moved on. However, I can tell that I was mostly able to reproduce the issue on a test server, but somehow it was harder (and the kernel was a different version of NetBSD).
-- Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org "You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks Owe it to yourself not to fail" Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.
participants (2)
-
Quentin Garnier
-
Timo Sirainen