hi folks and guys

I described in my blog (http://fakessh.eu/?p=150 http://fakessh.eu/?p=202 )the procedure for migrating from dovecot 1.2.11 to 2.0.0 there is the output of the 2 dovecot-n

I used rpm to update

Le mardi 05 octobre 2010 à 09:56 +0100, arif khwaja a écrit :

Dear All, Is there any easy way to upgrade Dovecot like yum command? Or I have to delete the current and install the new version then change the setting?>

I will appreciate if you can tell me the steps please?

Best Regards Arif

--- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request@dovecot.org <dovecot-request@dovecot.org> wrote:

From: dovecot-request@dovecot.org <dovecot-request@dovecot.org> Subject: dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 3 To: dovecot@dovecot.org Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 15:25

Send dovecot mailing list submissions to dovecot@dovecot.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to dovecot-request@dovecot.org

You can reach the person managing the list at dovecot-owner@dovecot.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of dovecot digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Noel Butler)
2. Re: how to upgrade dovecot (Noel Butler)
3. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Jerry)
4. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Jerry)
5. Re: how to upgrade dovecot (fakessh)
6. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Stan Hoeppner)
7. v1 ok, v2 not (Alberto)
8. Re: Possible bug with proxy in 2.0.4 (Ed W)

---

Message: 1 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000 From: Noel Butler <noel.butler@ausics.net> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? To: dovecot@dovecot.org Message-ID: <1285936645.21841.19.camel@tardis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:20 +0200, Jakob Curdes wrote:

...

All true, but there is a current 1.2.14 out there which should probably be preferred ove a two-and-a-half year old 1.0.15. Jakob

Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of using source packages and will insist on using a several yo version because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides, the 1.2 branch is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only oifferes 1.0.x, well, that says a lot about distro X/Y, we all know who X 'n Y are, without mentioning names :)