March 2016 - dovecot - dovecot.org

protocols.d/ dir empty?
by Kieran 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

(I hope I'm doing this right) Hey there. I have a problem with the dovecot protocols. When I do /telnet 127.0.0.1 143/ it gives me a connection refused error. I looked in the wiki and then after trying /doveconf protocols listen /I realized that I don't have any protocols.//I went in //usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/ and it's empty. How can I fix that?

3 3

multiple imapc settings in different namespaces
by abi＠oleane.net 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

hello all i assume this question must have already been asked, but i'm looking for a way to circumvent which might work specifically on my system. the version can be any available version between 2.2.9 and 2.2.22 (i'm testing with both of the above and no other ) i'm using imapc in 2 different namespaces. in both cases, the imapc_host is local, and a custom passdb program is expected to handle proxying to different servers. one of the case should proxy to a different legacy platform, and the other is used for shared mailboxes. is there any way at all to be able to tell which is which in passdb ? i don't care about the password, i can use a login prefix or suffix, different ports, different master passwords, ssl, maybe a different protocol name or auth method... somehow i've seen in the source code there is a namespace "owner" but did not manage to change this parameter. i guess it is used internally. anything else ? thanks a lot for any help you can provide best regards @abi

1 0

LMTP proxy does not pass RCPT TO: ... 5xx response back
by Heiko Schlittermann 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup. On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of the backends. The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at RCPT TO time. Here is what I typed, connected to the director Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded! 220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready. LHLO mailhub1.rz.hs-example.de 250-director1.rz.hs-example.de 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING MAIL FROM:<hs(a)schlittermann.de> 250 2.1.0 OK RCPT TO:<heiko(a)hs-example.de> 250 2.1.5 OK And here is, what TCPDUMP sees (cut for clarity): 00:22:23.029251 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [S], 00:22:23.029376 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [S.], 00:22:23.029660 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 00:22:23.051436 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], .7i`.7jN220 backend1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready. 00:22:23.051805 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 00:22:23.052017 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], .7jT.7i`LHLO director1.rz.hs-example.de 00:22:23.052034 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [.], 00:22:23.052114 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], .7ia.7jT250-backend1.rz.hs-example.de 250-XCLIENT ADDR PORT TTL TIMEOUT 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING 00:22:23.052476 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], 0EH....d...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ..... .7jT.7iaXCLIENT ADDR=2001:638:914:f33::7:1 PORT=60574 TTL=4 TIMEOUT=30 00:22:23.052540 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], 0EH...E....~e.....3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J .7ia.7jT220 backend1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready. 00:22:23.052815 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], 0E.....s...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ....E .7jT.7iaLHLO director1.rz.hs-example.de 00:22:23.052870 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], 0E....h....~......3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J .7ia.7jT250-backend1.rz.hs-example.de 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING 00:22:23.053120 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], 0E.....qJ..... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ....h .7jT.7iaMAIL FROM:<hs(a)schlittermann.de> RCPT TO:<heiko(a)hs-example.de> 00:22:23.091824 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [.], 0E.........~,.....3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J .7ik.7jT 00:22:23.119918 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], 0E.........~......3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J * .7ir.7jT250 2.1.0 OK * 552 5.2.2 <heiko(a)hs-example.de> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full) 00:22:23.158836 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 0F4....j...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ..... .7jo.7ir 00:27:23.029008 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [F.], 0F4....E...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ..... It looks as if the backend tells the director/proxy about the full mailbox (552 5.2.2 <heiko(a)hs-example.de> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)) already before the DATA phase starts, right as the response to the RCPT TO. But the proxy seems to ignore it… Any suggestion? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -

2 3

sieve - editheader - edit in place
by Hajo Locke 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hello, i do some tests with sieve editheader extensions. deleteheader and addheader are working, but i noticed that new headerlines are always prepended to current header. So new lines can be found always on top. I am looking for a possibility to edit a headerline in place, without moving the new line to top of stack(replaceheader?). It is not looking good if a Subject-Line suddenly moves to top of header. Is there a possibility for me? Thanks, Hajo

3 3

[BUG] Dovecot 2.2.22 lmtp child killed with signal 11
by Andreas Jobs 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hello, after upgrading to 2.2.22 the lmtp service is crashing (segfault) a few times per hours. >From the logs: Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(redacted(a)ruhr-uni-bochum.de): Info: ohZXLe1x7VaUeQAAEc+Mrg: sieve: msgid=<redacted(a)async.facebook.com>: discarding vacation response to mailinglist recipient <redacted(a)facebookmail.com> Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(31124): Info: Disconnect from 134.147.42.228: Successful quit Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(31124): Fatal: master: service(lmtp): child 31124 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) All those crashes have either a "send vacation response" or a "discarnding vacation response" in common. I'll attach a backtrace and the current configuration. --Andreas -- ! Andreas Jobs Network Operation Center ! ! Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum ! ! One Day I Will Find This Peer Guy and Then I Will Reset HIS Connection !

2 2

Index corruption in 2.2.18
by Anton Chevychalov 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

We are using dbox with lz4 compression and dovecot-lda + sieve for delivery. Mail recieved: Mar 16 06:27:55 mail2 dovecot: lda(svs(a)example.com): sieve: msgid=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4(a)rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' Around 08:14:00 user start his thunderbird with local filters. He found one mail without headers. Around that time user do repair folder in thunderbird: Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139) failed: Cached message size larger than expected (1572 > 980, box=Logs/Backup, UID=9763, cached Message-Id=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4(a)rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>) Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/boxes/example.com/svs/mailboxes/Logs/Backup/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: Broken physical size for mail UID 9763 Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139) failed: Cached message size larger than expected (1572 > 980, box=Logs/Backup, UID=9763, cached Message-Id=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4(a)rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>) (FETCH BODY[] for mailbox Logs/Backup UID 9763) Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Disconnected: FETCH read() failed in=14812 out=1077049 Mar 16 10:14:45 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139): FETCH BODY[] for mailbox Logs/Backup UID 9763 got too little data: 1008 vs 1613 Mar 16 10:14:45 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/boxes/example.com/svs/mailboxes/Logs/Backup/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: Broken virtual size for mail UID 9763 Mar 16 10:14:45 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Disconnected: FETCH failed in=837 out=641651 And still in a same state: Mar 16 11:42:51 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139): FETCH BODY[] for mailbox Logs/Backup UID 9763 got too little data: 1008 vs 1613 Mar 16 11:42:51 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/boxes/example.com/svs/mailboxes/Logs/Backup/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: Broken virtual size for mail UID 9763 Mar 16 11:42:51 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Disconnected: FETCH failed in=12462 out=984043 In thunderbird we see raw lz4 data. I have today backup (duplicate mail on exim to per day mbox). So I can restore that message, but I found older problems in other mailboxes and I can't restore it due to tapes rotation I see a lot of fixes in 2.2.19? Was it fixed after 2.2.18? -- Anton Chevychalov

3 2

doveadm sync/backup doesn't sync the metadata?
by Heiko Schlittermann 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

Hello, in a current migration project we want to migrate from Cyrus to Dovecot. The Cyrus server stores expiry information as ANNOTATIONS. On the Dovecot side I've set up the metadata/annotations plugin and it is working. But 'dovecot backup …' doesn't seem to sync these metadata? Did I miss something here? Shouldn't the metadata be part of the backup? (I'm using the latest 2.2.22 for sync purposes, as the stock dovecot just crashed when used as 'doveadm backup …') Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -

2 1

Understand the UID value in mailbox debug
by Tobi 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

Hi list we have a client who complains that mails from a certain sender are always put into his spamfolder. Our strong guess is that this is an issue with the webmail (Roundcube), but I need some help in understanding the output from dovecot's mailbox-debug. In order to narrow down the source of the problem we activated the mailbox-debug from Dovecot. Now we can see that the mail is moved into the spamfolder. But the strange thing is that a UID is logged which does not exist on the mailserver The following log is the "move" of the mail into the spamfolder Mar 19 11:53:57 backend3 dovecot: imap(REMOVED_FOR_PRIVACY): OmQLrmQubgDAqDIW copy from INBOX: box=INBOX.Spam, uid=58, msgid=<000601d181cd$71401940$53c04bc0$(a)bluewin.ch>, size=314585 Mar 19 11:53:57 backend3 dovecot: imap(REMOVED_FOR_PRIVACY): OmQLrmQubgDAqDIW delete: box=INBOX, uid=1614, msgid=<000601d181cd$71401940$53c04bc0$(a)bluewin.ch>, size=314585 Mar 19 11:53:57 backend3 dovecot: imapREMOVED_FOR_PRIVACY): OmQLrmQubgDAqDIW expunge: box=INBOX, uid=1614, msgid=<000601d181cd$71401940$53c04bc0$(a)bluewin.ch>, size=314585 I do not understand whose UID this is, as it does not exist on the server. Does dovecot create temporary UID or something like that? Or is it more a process ID? Thanks and regards tobi

4 5

Problem configuring sieve
by Jerry 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

This is a fresh installation of dovecot on a FreeBSD 11 system. Trying to run the following command produces this error: sievec ./default.sieve sievec(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot sievec(root): Error: Couldn't load required plugin /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib90_sieve_plugin.so: Can't load plugin sieve_plugin: Plugin is intended to be used only by binaries: lda lmtp (we're sievec) sievec(root): Fatal: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. *** Error code 89 This is my configuration: # 2.2.22 (fe789d2): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.12 (c1c0a23) # OS: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 zfs auth_mechanisms = plain login lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_debug = yes mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/vmail/%d/gerard mail_plugins = sieve mail_save_crlf = yes managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { auto = subscribe special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { auto = subscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/users/passwd driver = passwd-file } plugin { sieve_default = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve } postmaster_address = postmaster(a)seibercom.net service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } unix_listener auth-userdb { group = vmail mode = 0666 user = vmail } } service dict { unix_listener dict { group = vmail mode = 0600 user = vmail } } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/demoCA/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/demoCA/private/dovecot.pem ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 userdb { args = username_format=%u /usr/local/etc/dovecot/users/passwd driver = passwd-file } protocol lda { mail_plugins = sieve } There is nothing in the logs regarding this. Can anyone help me? -- Jerry

2 1

Re: Setting up public mailboxes - user not found
by Marti Markov 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

Hey, I actually went with the method suggested by Steffen Kaiser of creating a separate userdb because I use LDAP and I have an OU which contains all the public mailboxes and was just easier. I setup the userdb like so: userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-shared_mailboxes.conf.ext driver = ldap override_fields = mail=maildir:/home/vmail/Public/.%n } Now when I send an email to office3(a)xxx.com I don’t get any errors and it delivers the message to the office3(a)xxx.com: root@mail:~# ls /home/vmail/Public/.office3/new/ 1458427035.M781836P21781.mail.xxx.com,S=2571,W=2630 1458427705.M750112P23338.mail.xxx.com,S=2501,W=2559 But from any mail client I try I don’t seem to be able to list anything in the Public directory. Am I missing something in the configuration? Here is the public namespace configuration: namespace { list = yes location = maildir:/home/vmail/Public:INDEXPVT=~/Maildir/Public prefix = Public/ separator = / subscriptions = yes type = public } > On 17 Mar 2016, at 08:35, Burckhard Schmidt <bschmidt(a)cms.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > > hello Marti, > > Am 17.03.2016 um 06:18 schrieb Marti Markov: >> First of all thanks for the reply Burckhard. >> When you say: >>> You can use a "normal" user who has a sieve script: > > Normal user that's an account with one or more email aliasses. > So this "user" can receive emails like any other user. This I called "normal" user. But this ist not of interest in our case. > So you don't get an "user not found". > > Next you will add an appropriate email alias to the account if necessary (our accounts are cryptic). > > Now you have an account/user and you can write a sieve script for that user to deliver all emails into one public folder or into different folders. Public subfolders are possible too, if you like or are able to distinguish incomming emails. > > In your case it is not necessary to have an user/account "office3". This name you would only use in that sieve script with "fileinto". > > Regards! > > Burckhard > >> what would that user be in my case? office3? Because I don’t really see how it will solve the problem of getting the error 550 user not found when making the LDAP search. >> >>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:50, Burckhard Schmidt <bschmidt(a)cms.hu-berlin.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 09.03.2016 um 20:02 schrieb Marti Markov: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This is the first time I use the dovecot mail list so I’m sorry if I forget something. >>>> >>>> My problem is that for some reason I can get public mailboxes to work. I have setup the directory Public, the folders and the cur,tmp and new folder in them: >>>> >>>> Public >>>> | >>>> |- .office3 >>>> | >>>> |- cur >>>> |- tmp >>>> |- new >>>> |- dovecot-acl >>>> >>>> >>>> Here is my dovecot conf: >>>> >>> >>>> namespace { >>>> list = yes >>>> location = maildir:/home/vmail/xxx.com/Public:INDEXPVT=~/Maildir/Public >>>> prefix = Public/ >>>> separator = / >>>> subscriptions = yes >>>> type = public >>>> } >>> >>> You can use a "normal" user who has a sieve script: >>> require ... >>> any filter if necessary >>> fileinto "Public"; >>> discard; >>> ... >>> >>> "Public" is your prefix >>> I have several subfolder so I use: fileinto "Public/subfolder1"; >>> >>> You would have >>> /home/vmail/xxx.com/Public/subfolder1 >>> with cur new tmp >>> and a file "dovecot-acl" containing anyone lrs >>> >>> -- >>> Burckhard Schmidt >> > > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen --- Burckhard Schmidt > > Abteilung Systemsoftware und Kommunikation > ZE Computer- und Medienservice der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin > Postanschrift: Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin > Standort: Rudower Chaussee 26; 12489 Berlin > Tel.: +49-30-2093-70058 Fax: +49-30-2093-70199 > Mail: bschmidt(a)cms.hu-berlin.de <mailto:bschmidt@cms.hu-berlin.de>

1 0