[Dovecot] dsync - one or two ways?

[Charles Marcus]

On 7/17/2009, Timo Sirainen (tss at iki.fi) wrote:
> Either continuous replication or just one-off user moves/conversions
> without locking the mailbox and without losing changes done during the
> move/conversion.

This just sounds great, and yes, I can definitely see a need for both.

> I think even using dsync for backups should be considered as two-way
> replication. If there really are some new mails in your backup server
> that aren't in the primary server, it most likely means you just lost
> some mails on your primary server and you need to get them back.

Or you just deleted them and *don't* want them back... ;)

-- 

Best regards,

Charles