[Dovecot] Follow-up re: gcc 2.96 - Re: PATCH: compile dovecot-1.1.beta14 with gcc 2.95

[Kevin A. McGrail]

I can't argue with that logic but documenting it in a wiki or INSTALL or 
including the patches with the distribution might be more agreeable.

And yes, the patch below was a cut and paste from your patch.  I didn't mean 
to say otherwise just to point out that for gcc 2.96, only two small array 
size changes were needed.

Regards,
KAM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sven Anderson" <sven at anderson.de>
> This is included in my patch already, but Timo didn't want to commit it,
> since [0] is gcc specific, and [] is C99 standard.
>
> Kevin A. McGrail schrieb:
>> As a follow-up on this, these two lines also helped me to compile the
>> 1.1rc1 on gcc 2.96:
>>
>> diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c
>> dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib/str-find.c
>> --- dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c       Tue Oct 23 16:01:16 2007
>> +++ dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib/str-find.c       Thu Jan 17
>> 14:08:03 2008
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>>        unsigned int match_count;
>>
>>        int badtab[UCHAR_MAX+1];
>> -       int goodtab[];
>> +       int goodtab[0];
>> };
>>
>> static void init_badtab(struct str_find_context *ctx)
>> diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib-imap/imap-match.c
>> dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib-imap/imap-match.c
>> --- dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib-imap/imap-match.c        Sun Dec  9
>> 19:14:27 2007
>> +++ dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib-imap/imap-match.c        Thu Jan
>> 17 14:09:02 2008
>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>        struct imap_match_pattern *patterns;
>>
>>        char sep;
>> -       char patterns_data[];
>> +       char patterns_data[0];
>> };