[Dovecot] 'Doveadm user' could use better error codes
dovecot at vosslamber.nl
Tue Dec 28 17:25:54 EET 2010
On 28-12-10 16:07, David Ford wrote:
> dovecot, the whole point of his original email is to return a useful
> error code for the purpose of scripting. :) always returning 0 for both
> valid and invalid usernames isn't helpful
But the original mail show an invalid use of the doveadm command
'doveadm user', which correctly produced a return-value of '1'
And a correclty formed command 'doveadm user foo', which correctly
At the end of 'man doveadm-user' it says:
Report bugs, including doveconf -n output, to the Dovecot
Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>."
While i think this is a change-request, and not a bug, i still wonder
what the output of 'dovecot -n' will help in this case ;-)
More information about the dovecot