[Dovecot] Dovecot v1.2 assert() in ACL
tss at iki.fi
Tue Jun 16 18:29:31 EEST 2009
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Now I wonder, why there exists "an empty set of rights" at all?
To remove all rights from someone.
> Shouldn't "SETACL mailbox id" (no rights string) behave differently
> than "DELETEACL mailbox id" then as well? Currently it removes the
> ACL entry of id.
> Reading the RFC I get the impression, that SETACL should have three
> arguments always.
I think that's correct and it's probably an implementation kludge to
even allow two parameter SETACL.
More information about the dovecot