[Dovecot] Postfix LDA vs the Dovecot LDA + other quetions
CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com
Mon Feb 23 16:50:45 EET 2009
On 2/23/2009 9:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 23:58 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
>> 2. What is the benefit of using Dovecot's SASL as compared to Cyrus SASL? Is there better performance?
> Probably not, but I've always hated configuring Cyrus SASL. It's not as
> flexible and the error and debug messages are worse.
I agree... but the one disadvantage to dovecot sasl is it cannot be used
as CLIENT mechanism... is adding this capability by any chance on the radar?
More information about the dovecot