[Dovecot] Version numbering
james at lovedthanlost.net
Wed Mar 28 07:52:36 EEST 2007
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:46:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.YYYYMMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
Whilst I understand objections to type a) version numbering I think the confusion that would be generated by type b) version numbering outweighs the issue of alpha version numeric (or a combination thereof) versioning. My vote is for type a) versioning.
More information about the dovecot