[Dovecot] mbox slowness in dovecot-1.0-test61
tomi.hakala at clinet.fi
Thu Jan 27 18:44:39 EET 2005
Todd Burroughs wrote:
> We're trying out Dovecot to see if it's a good replacement for UW-imapd.
> It seems to be very slow in opening an mbox file, even after it's been
> indexed. (I mean way slower than UW)
In which point you see the slowdown? Just after login or after issuing
some searches first?
For me test61 works very well with mboxes, but I'm not running it on NFS.
More information about the dovecot