[dovecot-cvs] dovecot dovecot-example.conf,1.194.2.30,1.194.2.31

tss at dovecot.org tss at dovecot.org
Thu Dec 21 23:54:17 UTC 2006


Update of /var/lib/cvs/dovecot
In directory talvi:/tmp/cvs-serv18395

Modified Files:
      Tag: branch_1_0
	dovecot-example.conf 
Log Message:
Changed maildir_copy_with_hardlinks setting's description to be much more
positive. It'll probably be set to yes by default in v2.0.



Index: dovecot-example.conf
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/lib/cvs/dovecot/dovecot-example.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.194.2.30
retrieving revision 1.194.2.31
diff -u -d -r1.194.2.30 -r1.194.2.31
--- dovecot-example.conf	21 Dec 2006 15:59:04 -0000	1.194.2.30
+++ dovecot-example.conf	21 Dec 2006 23:54:15 -0000	1.194.2.31
@@ -393,19 +393,15 @@
 ## Maildir-specific settings
 ##
 
-# By default LIST command returns all entries in maildir beginning with dot.
+# By default LIST command returns all entries in maildir beginning with a dot.
 # Enabling this option makes Dovecot return only entries which are directories.
 # This is done by stat()ing each entry, so it causes more disk I/O.
 # (For systems setting struct dirent->d_type, this check is free and it's
 # done always regardless of this setting)
 #maildir_stat_dirs = no
 
-# Copy mail to another folders using hard links. This is much faster than
-# actually copying the file. This is problematic only if something modifies
-# the mail in one folder but doesn't want it modified in the others. I don't
-# know any MUA which would modify mail files directly. IMAP protocol also
-# requires that the mails don't change, so it would be problematic in any case.
-# If you care about performance, enable it.
+# When copying a message, do it with hard links whenever possible. This makes
+# the performance much better, and it's unlikely to have any side effects.
 #maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = no
 
 ##



More information about the dovecot-cvs mailing list