[dovecot-cvs] dovecot dovecot-example.conf,1.17,1.18
cras at procontrol.fi
cras at procontrol.fi
Thu Nov 21 22:31:05 EET 2002
- Previous message: [dovecot-cvs] dovecot/src/master imap-process.c,1.7,1.8 settings.c,1.17,1.18 settings.h,1.11,1.12
- Next message: [dovecot-cvs] dovecot/src/lib-index mail-index-open.c,1.16,1.17 mail-index.h,1.52,1.53
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Update of /home/cvs/dovecot
In directory danu:/tmp/cvs-serv12327
Modified Files:
dovecot-example.conf
Log Message:
mail_read_mmaped: Use mmap() instead of read() to read mail files. read()
seems to be a bit faster with my Linux/x86 and it's better with NFS, so
that's the default.
Index: dovecot-example.conf
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/dovecot/dovecot-example.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -d -r1.17 -r1.18
--- dovecot-example.conf 21 Nov 2002 20:13:32 -0000 1.17
+++ dovecot-example.conf 21 Nov 2002 20:31:02 -0000 1.18
@@ -165,6 +165,10 @@
# But it also creates a bit more disk I/O which may just make it slower.
#mail_save_crlf = no
+# Use mmap() instead of read() to read mail files. read() seems to be a bit
+# faster with my Linux/x86 and it's better with NFS, so that's the default.
+#mail_read_mmaped = no
+
# Copy mail to another folders using hard links. This is much faster than
# actually copying the file. Only problem with it is that if either of the
# mails are modified directly both will change. This isn't a problem with
- Previous message: [dovecot-cvs] dovecot/src/master imap-process.c,1.7,1.8 settings.c,1.17,1.18 settings.h,1.11,1.12
- Next message: [dovecot-cvs] dovecot/src/lib-index mail-index-open.c,1.16,1.17 mail-index.h,1.52,1.53
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the dovecot-cvs
mailing list